Jennie Agg: Journalist

Writer. Sub. Critic. Gin drinker.

Tag: Simon Stephens

What did I think? I hated it – go see it NOW!

I *really* didn’t enjoy Simon Stephens’ Three Kingdoms. I emerged from the theatre feeling feverishly shivery. However, 48 hours on, I haven’t been able to stop thinking about it. Which might just make it the best piece of theatre I’ve seen.

Yesterday I devoured the reviews from press night with an urgency – bordering on desperation – to know what other people thought that I’d never really felt before.

My reaction, it seems, falls between two camps. The mainstream critics didn’t like it much either and were pretty dismissive, though I agreed with a lot of what Sarah Hemming says here for the Financial Times. (Though this might be my favourite reading of the play…)

Yet a look at Twitter suggests lots of other folk couldn’t rave about it enough. And, oddly, even though I didn’t like the thing, I agree with far more of what this camp has to say about it. Particularly this from Postcards From The Gods and this by Daniel B Yates for Exeunt mag.

It’s worth saying that I found it very, very difficult to review Three Kingdoms in any kind of concise, precise way. And a lot of the good stuff I felt about it doesn’t really come across in my piece for playtosee.com. For instance I could have gushed for pages about how stunning the production looks. As Andrew Haydon points out in his Postcards blog, it is a  wholly theatrical experience rather than good telly being done live.  I agree that Three Kingdoms is a phenomenal example of just what can be created with a three-walled box and some actors.

And even though I didn’t like it (and I’ve tried my very best to explain why in my review, posted below), the reason, two days on, that I think it’s probably one of the best pieces of theatre I’ve seen is that if anyone asked if they should bother seeing it, my answer would be a resounding  HELL YES.

That and the fact I still can’t get it out of my head.

Three Kingdoms @ Lyric Hammersmith

(Until May 19)

Two men are interrogating a teenage boy in a grimy room painted municipal greenish-grey. They throw him a Mars bar and a bottle of water, which he drinks greedily. They could easily be gangsters and the lad their hostage. It turns out they are police detectives and they are investigating the murder of a prostitute whose severed head had been found washed up on the banks of the Thames.

Three Kingdoms starts off as a logical enough thriller, told through police interviews and hinging on the quirky dynamic between Ferdy Roberts and Nicolas Tennant as  detectives Charlie (posh, sensitive, offers suspects coffee) and Ignatius (not so posh, taunts suspects and thumps things) but it unravels into something far more chaotic.

 

The murder investigation turns into a hunt for a sex-trafficking ringleader, taking us from the West London police station to the lair of an Estonian gang via a seedy German hotel and a porn factory. The deeper Ignatius and Charlie dig, the more off-the-wall the treatment of the story becomes – characters tumble about the stage, emerge from suitcases or deliver lines with their head in a bale of straw. The second act is a full-blown hallucinatory pageant of gangsters and pimps in wolf masks, cabaret-style singing and sex-workers in cheap wigs and sequins. The nightmarishness finds its climax in a cacophonous rendition of PJ Harvey’s The Last Living Rose (‘God Damn Europeans/ Take Me Back To Beautiful England’). It’s exhausting and disorientating to watch – an effect rammed home by the multi-lingual nature of the show; huge chunks are told in German and Estonian with English sur-titles.

Part of London’s World Stages project, Three Kingdoms is three types of theatre from three different countries stitched together. It has a script by acclaimed British playwright Simon Stephens (The Trial of Ubu, Punk Rock), is realised by German director Sebastian Nubling and incorporates the athletic work of Estonian group Teater NO99. Although it’s a powerful collaboration, by the end the sutures irritate.  Stephens’ initial whodunit plot is muddied by the increasingly surreal and hyper-physical staging. The feeling of being utterly lost in an alien culture, cut off by language, is precisely recreated by Nubling, but the plot falls by the wayside – with Charlie disappearing, inexplicably, from the action altogether.

And the visuals alone are not as interesting – or as nuanced – as what Stephens’ script had promised in the early scenes. The gallows humour and something-and-nothing conversations between the detectives, their methods for getting information from suspects, and the odd set-up between Ignatius and his young wife succeed in the same way Stephens’ plays Herons or Punk Rock succeed – with the big ideas quietly rooted in very specific people in very specific social structures.

But as the neat plotting and taut dialogue is abandoned in favour of something stranger, the ideas become more forced, the speeches more leaden. The choreography, lighting and Ene-Liis Semper’sdesign are all breathtaking, yet a lot of the imagery feels hollow without the support of the script – what does having the traffickers wear wolf masks and the sex-workers wear doe masks really say beyond ‘predator’ and ‘victim’?

This is the other problem with Three Kingdoms – it feels like a play about sex-trafficking without very much to say about sex-trafficking. Preoccupied as it is with barriers of language, globalisation, ‘the dislocation of travel’, and European identity, and without any real sense of the girls themselves, the sex trade in the play feels like mere window dressing.

For all its theatrical muscle, I found Three Kingdoms increasingly hard to follow and couldn’t shake the feeling that the heart had been cut out of Stephens’ writing some way before the interval.

Punkrock @ Royal Exchange, Manchester

 (Reviewed  October 22, 2009)

punkrock

Standing in the foyer waiting to go into Simon Stephens’ latest play Punkrock really put paid to those naysayers who bleat that theatre never attracts a youthful audience. It also put paid to the opening line I’d been mentally penning all the way from Piccadilly Gardens. For as soon as I stepped foot in the place, it became plain that my planned musings about the Royal Exchange not being a particularly ‘punk rock’ kind of theatre (its clientele tending to be more ‘daytrip to Blackpool to buy rock’) had been woefully undermined by the presence of several coach loads of fresh faced teens.

And how glad I was to be undermined. It would have been a huge waste had Punkrock, with its sixth-form age characters and thrashing soundtrack, had to play to a huddle of octogenarians who would have secretly preferred Noel Coward. Set in the upper school library of a Stockport private college, Punkrock is a heady clash of teenage philosophy- and no, not just the school of iPod there I am. The play is crafted from the kind of conversations you can only have when you’re 17 – from grandiose meanderings on the nature of humanity to angst-filled panic over mock exams. Love, loss, identity, sexuality and class are all given a hearing. Particularly compelling are the musings of disturbed teen William (Tom Sturridge), who rails against the limits of his suburban hometown.

Helped along by uniformly (no pun intended) excellent, nuanced performances from the young cast, Stephen’s script motors along smoothly and before you know it just another morning break time morphs seamlessly into a Columbine-style atrocity.

Many hands have been wrung over whether Punkrock adds anything new. Comparisons to everything from Lord of the Flies to The History Boys have been flung at the play, yet look at the play closely and none of these should stick. Stephens’ script effectively offers a rebuttal to youth-culture-according-to-Skins, despite the bleak climax of the play (which is as jolting as the bursts of Big Black and Sonic Youth et al. that punctuate each scene) Punkrock remains a play suffused in the importance of normality.

How refreshing that Lilly (Jessica Raine) is permitted to describe losing her virginity as “lovely”. How significant that Stephens doesn’t insist on framing it in terms of teen pregnancy or angst or pain, rather he just allows it to happen; sensibly, premeditated and with enjoyment. How un-Skins. Likewise, the final scene of the play, for all its odd, purgatorial overtones, set in a psychiatrist’s office, serves to remind us that even after the unthinkable has happened, normality prevails.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.